Dialogue 154 gCivilizationh is nothing but root cause

gThingh is nothing.
gNothingh is thing.
This is nothing but a truth for our human beings who try to live in seeking for insubstantial image and in escaping from substance.
We human beings try to live in seeking for galiveh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gdeadh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for ghealthyh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gillh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for grichh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gpoorh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for ghappyh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gunhappyh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for gheavenh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from ghellh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for ggodh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gdevilh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for grulerh (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gruledh (substance).
We human beings try to live in seeking for glighth (insubstantial image) and in escaping from gdarknessh (substance).
gDeadh, gillh, gpoorh, gunhappyh, ghellh, gdevilh and gruled (slave, public, and nations)h is substance.
gAliveh, ghealthyh, grichh, ghappyh, gheavenh, ggodh and gruler (king, noble, priest and officer)h is insubstantial image.
So far, we human beings have lived in believing galiveh, ghealthyh, grichh, ghappyh, gheavenh, ggodh and gruler (king, noble, priest and officer)h as virtue and gdeadh, gillh, gpoorh, gunhappyh, ghellh, gdevilh and gruled (slave, public, and nations)h as evil.
However, we human beings also understand that there is no ghealthyh which is absent concept of gillh.
In other words,
We understand very well that there is no ghealthyh which is absent concept of gillh, insubstantial image.
We understand very well that there is no galiveh which is absent concept of gdeadh, insubstantial image.
We understand very well that there is no grichh which is absent concept of gpoorh, insubstantial image.
We understand very well that there is no ghappyh which is absent concept of gunhappyh, insubstantial image.
We understand very well that there is no gheavenh which is absent concept of ghellh, insubstantial image.
We understand very well that there is no ggodh which is absent concept of gdevilh, insubstantial image.
We understand very well that there is no gruler (king, noble, priest and officer)h which is absent concept of gruled (slave, public, and nations)h, insubstantial image.
Why and from when and from where have we lived with such misunderstandings?
It had to be the time when we had created the language.
There were some guys who forged the language which made insubstantial as good image and substantial as bad image.
gThe Old and New Testamenth is typical root cause.
All bibles in the world are also typical root cause.
Letters were born about over ten thousands years ago, and languages were also born nearly same time.
Therefore, our crucial misunderstandings had been made since the Egyptian civilization, the Mesopotamia civilization, the Indus civilization and the Chinese civilization around over ten thousands years ago.
Civilization is nothing but the root cause.
Religion and science are nothing but the root cause.