|
Dialogue 309 Fool of dualism for wise and fool is real virtue of gmodestyh The meaning of gwiseh and gfoolh is opposite which is antonym in the society of common sense till 20th century. Therefore, We human beings fell into the trap of grelative monism of utilitarianismh such as gwise is virtue and fool is evilh. My book [A life through Reality] Chapter896 gFool of dualism for wise and fool is real virtue of gmodestyhh talked that fool is substance and wise is just an absent concept of fool and substantial fool is nothing but real virtue of gmodestyh. My book [A life through Reality] Chapter896 gFool of dualism for wise and fool is real virtue of gmodestyhh is quoted as below. The worldly success is nothing but to gain an artificial desire which are hunger for money, for fame and for power as much as possible. An artificial desire is endless hunger under which decimal numeral system such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 0 is hidden. Lust which is instinctive desire such as sexual desire and appetite desire are limited hunger under which the law of trinity in the whole universe, gmotion space of light and soundh on the basis of 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3EEEendless circular motion of birth (starting point), life (circumference) and death (ending point) is hidden. Socrates and Plato, Diogenes and Aristotle in ancient Greek philosophy. Lao Tzu and Confucius in ancient China. Plato, Aristotle and Confucius who were called as wise men thought logically and decimal numeral system such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 0 is hidden behind logical horizontal thinking. Socrates, Diogenes and Lao Tzu who were called as sages thought illogically and 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3EEEendless numeral system is hidden behind illogical vertical thinking. Wise man and sage. Socrates, Diogenes and Lao Tzu who were called as sages might have looked mad men for Plato, Aristotle and Confucius who were called as wise men. Diogenes who stood with naked before Alexander the great looked mad man or fool for Aristotle who was a teacher of Alexander the great. Lao Tzu who never wrote the book and did nothing at all might have looked mad men or fool for Confucius who wrote the Analects. Socrates, Diogenes and Lao Tzu might have looked dangerous men for Plato, Aristotle and Confucius who got the worldly success. There are two types of traditions which are history and myth in the way of human history. The history was books which were written by wise men who were Plato, Aristotle and Confucius. The myth was dialogues which were traded by sages who were Socrates, Diogenes and Lao Tzu. History is nothing but pseudo history which was forged by conquerors. Myth is nothing but real history which was traded secretly by those who had nothing to do with worldly success. Wise men and foolish men. Real men and pseudo men. Pseudo men are nothing but the ones who did not live for themselves. Real men are nothing but the ones who lived for themselves. Those who lived for themselves could go beyond both life and death, but those who did not live for themselves could not go beyond both life and death. To go beyond both life and death means something to go with self after death. It is truth. To not go beyond both life and death means something not to go with self after death. It is worldly success. Wise men are nothing but the ones who can not go beyond both life and death, and are afraid of death. Fools are nothing but the ones who can go beyond both life and death, and are not afraid of death. The worldly success wise men will be ugly in later life. The modesty fools will be pure in later life. Fool of dualism for wise and fool is nothing but real virtue of gmodestyh |