|
Monologue 7 Nature society vs. Human society Nature vs. Science There are a lot of developing countries in which the average life span is less than 30 years while some advanced countries like Japan boast that it is more than 80 years. The average life span in countries whose population is increasing is short; the counterpart in countries whose population is decreasing is long. The phenomenon of a rapid increase in population can be seen in African nations, whose average life span is less than 30 years, due to AIDS and starvation. It seems to be a paradoxical phenomenon on the surface. Advanced countries: the population ought to be increasing because of abundant food, clothing, shelter and the advance in medical treatment but it is decreasing. Developing countries: the population ought to be decreasing because of poor food, clothing, shelter and the lack of medical treatment but it is increasing. How do we understand this paradoxical phenomenon? In advanced countries, Why don’t the parents in such circumstances as affluent food, clothing, and shelter have a baby although they can succeed and inherit property? Why don’t the parents in such circumstances as rich medical treatment have a baby although they don’t need to worry about diseases? In developing countries, Why do the parents who are infected with AIDS have a baby although the disease is hereditary? Why do the parents who are suffering starvation have a baby although they cannot feed him? It seems to be an unintelligible phenomenon on the surface. Such phenomena occur that we human can’t understand with intelligence. They are caused by the law of food chain in nature. It shows that reality does not follow the rules in human society where we try to solve all problems with science. We human beings who have intelligence live a life with the way of thinking that “alive is good and dead is bad”: relative monism of utilitarianism. The other creatures that don’t have intelligence live a life with the way of being that “there is neither alive nor dead”: absolute monism. Schizophrenic human beings with the way of thinking and the way of being. Other creatures only with the way of being. It is evident that the way of being defeats the way of thinking. It is the reason why it seems to be a paradoxical phenomenon on the surface. The progress of science has enabled some human beings to extend their average life span to 80 years while the law of food chain in nature prevents some human beings from reaching 30 years old; however, the total population is soaring eventually, so the law should react severely to human beings. Advanced countries may blame developing countries for the rapid increase in population, believing that it is not their responsibility; however, which is absolutely wrong. It is the result of that the minority, advanced countries, has been exploiting the majority, developing ones. Entering modern times, the rapid increase in population began but it had not yet before modern times especially in developing countries. Population of developing countries began to increase as a part of self-protection because the Western Imperialism adopted a colonial policy in order to exploit them. It is evidently owing to the law of food chain in nature. If lions killed zebras not only for today’s food but for tomorrow’s, zebras would produce much more offspring instinctively in fear of extinction. The more the eater (the ruler) eat, the more the eaten (the ruled) increase. This is the law of food chain in nature; as a result, both of them should be extinguished by the law as a punishment for violating it. In the world of nature where other creatures live, therefore, they never have extra food. They are satisfied only with today’s food. Only in human society we are not satisfied with today’s food, stocking extra food for tomorrow. As a result, we created the dual structure of the ruler and the ruled, the male-oriented society, the succession-and-inheritance discriminatory system and at last ended up with the society where discrimination, unfairness and wars prevail. This vicious circle is at its worst now. What comes next, therefore, is extinction by the strict law of food chain in nature. Actually amphibians such as a frog are threatened with extinction, coral throughout the world would be extinct if the sea temperature rose four degrees in Celsius more and some mammals like a white bear and a whale are also on the verge of extinction. These phenomena are human responsibility; which also causes the rapid increase in population in developing countries while their average life span is becoming drastically short. The culprit of these phenomena is that advanced countries are continuing the exploitation because of their greed. This is the cause of the rapid population increase in modern society. That’s why we want not only today’s food but also tomorrow’s. Mammonism is nothing but to want food not only for today but also for tomorrow, for the day after tomorrow,・・・, for the day before we die. Ultra mammonism is nothing but to want food not only for today but also for tomorrow, for the day after tomorrow,・・・, for the day before we die and, furthermore, for the day after we die. We have no choice but to reach the world view of trinity - “beyond alive and dead” - in order to stop the vicious circle. The earth will surely exterminate mankind if they continue the vicious circle. Your own power of natural healing will surely exterminate it if something unusual happened to your body. The earth’s power of natural healing will surely exterminate it if something unusual happened to the earth’s body. The function of human body and feeling was born of that of the earth because we human beings were born of the earth. We, therefore, must not forget that the earth reacts in the same way human body does. We, therefore, we must not forget that the feeling of the earth reacts in the same way human feeling does. Other creatures live by the law of the earth (nature): absolute monism. Only we human beings live by intelligence: relative dualism. To make it worse, We are under the delusion that we live by the wrong rules of human society: relative monism of utilitarianism. We human beings have taken a deviating course, relative monism of utilitarianism, which is a necessary evil notwithstanding that relative dualism is a process, which is a necessary virtue, to reach self-actualizing absolute trinity from absolute monism after all. The necessary virtue is allowed to exist but the necessary evil never fails to be eliminated. The reason why we live in a cycle of birth, life and death (which is called circular motion) is that space is also continuing the circular motion: birth, life and death. After all absolute monism, relative dualism and absolute trinity are a circular motion. Mankind, therefore, will be exterminated by the earth unless we change tracks of the way of living from the wrong relative monism of utilitarianism that “life is good and death is bad” to the original relative dualism that “life and death are two sides of the same coin; death is essence and life is just the concept of the absence of death”. “Death is everywhere”. It is common sense for wild animals. It is indeed a proof that the feeling of death is nothing but the feeling of time (imaginary time in the vertical world) which is “now & here”. The scale of biological clock wild animals have is the scale of imaginary time. The feeling of death, therefore, is nothing but the feeling of imaginary time which is “now & here”. It is a proof of “death is everywhere”. Wild animals eat because they want, sleep because they want and mate because they want. These desires do not come in accordance with real time, which is the scale of time called future, but come in accordance with imaginary time, which is the graduation of biological clock. They, therefore, have no idea of food for tomorrow, sleep for tomorrow, coupling for tomorrow. On the other hand, “Death is surely coming someday”. It is common sense for human beings who have intelligence. It is indeed a proof that the concept of death is nothing but the concept of time (real time in the horizontal world) which is the past, the present and the future. The scale of clock we human beings have is the scale of real time. The concept of death, therefore, is nothing but the concept of real time which is the past, the present and the future. It is a proof of “death is surely coming someday”. We wake up willy-nilly at 7 am though we don’t want, eat willy-nilly at noon though we don’t want, sleep willy-nilly at 10 pm though we don’t want and sex willy-nilly to sleep willy-nilly at 10 pm though we don’t want. These desires do not come in accordance with imaginary time of “now & here” which is the graduation of biological clock but come in accordance with real time of the past, the present and the future which is the scale of clock. We, therefore, eat for tomorrow, sleep for tomorrow, have sex for tomorrow and finally spend day and night in discrimination, unfairness and war for tomorrow. It is a biological clock of imaginary time - “now & here” - that feels “death is everywhere”. It is a clock of real time - the past, the present and the future - that thinks “death is surely coming someday”. There are two kinds of clock showing two kinds of scale of time. It can be said a biological (internal) clock and an out-of-body (external) clock. Wild animals have the feeling of time, feeling the biological clock with their whole body. We human beings have the concept of time, viewing the out-of-body clock through five senses. It is a proof that feeling is nothing but total feeling. It is a proof that concept is nothing but partial view. It proves that “the way of being” is nothing but the total feeling. It proves that “the way of thinking” is nothing but the partial view. Feeling is “being”. Viewing is “thinking”. In other words, Five senses are not for feeling but for viewing. Body is not for viewing but for feeling. It is not five senses but five views. This is also a big problem human beings have been misunderstanding. Two eyes as the visual organ. Two ears as the auditory organ. Two nostrils as the olfactory organ. One tongue as the organ of taste. Whole skin as the sensory organ of touch. The part of skin of the body is so called five senses. In other words, the organ distinguishing oneself from others is five senses, which is a borderline between oneself and others. It should not be five senses but five views because the organ distinguishing oneself from others doesn’t think of the partial view but feels the total feeling. It is the reason why feeling is being. It is the reason why viewing is thinking. In short, we human beings are creatures that feel by the body and think with five views. As we human beings think at the cerebral cortex, external information received through five views is first sorted at the cerebral new cortex, secondly sorted at the cerebral old cortex and sent to each organ. The first sorting is “thinking” and the second one is “being”. Reason (new cortex) suppresses instinct (old cortex). As for other creatures, external information received through five senses is sorted at the cerebral old cortex and sent to each organ. It is indeed “being” only with instinct. We human being, therefore, views the distinguishing thinking (partial view) from others through five views although the other creatures feel the total feeling among others through five senses. Five senses never distinguish oneself from others. Five views do distinguish oneself from others. It is the reason why the gap between the biological (internal) clock - “now & here”- and the out-of-body (external) clock - the past, the present and the future - is due to five senses (five views). Wild animals living with feeling that “death is everywhere” feel a sense of belonging to nature through five senses. They believe in nature - the earth - as mother earth. We human beings living with thinking that “death is surely coming someday” think about partial view of nature through five views. We think of nature - the earth - as a target of exploitation. We fight for a territory as we assume that land to be human’s. We fight for gold and oil so as to make money, which ends up with a war for concession. We make an atomic bomb with radioactive elements, which has been injuring the earth in the name of a nuclear test. It is inevitable that we are condemned as a criminal offender who squeezes the earth. The ringleader is politicians, businessmen and scientists. Religionists are the accomplice. In a word, they are greedy lots for power, money and honor. The earth should never allow such a human society they lead. We must make a radical change in our sense of value. The key is to change our incoherent way of thinking from “death is surely coming someday” to “death is everywhere”. “Death comes all of a sudden.” It is a proof that “death is everywhere.” We human beings, however, are foolishly prepossessed with the incoherent idea, “death is surely coming someday.” The idea is impossible because “death may come someday” or “death may not come forever” if “death is not everywhere.” Death must always subsist in us so that “death comes all of a sudden.” “Death is everywhere,” which is a proof that death is substance and life is just the concept of the absence of death human beings made up. “Ill comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that ill is substance and healthy is just the concept of the absence of ill human beings made up. “Unhappy comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other word, It is a proof that unhappy is substance and happy is just the concept of the absence of unhappy human beings made up. Therefore, “Female comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that female is substance and male is just the concept of the absence of female human beings made up. “Wrong comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that wrong is substance and right is just the concept of the absence of wrong human beings made up. “Weak comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that weak is substance and strong is just the concept of the absence of weak human beings made up. “Fool comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that fool is substance and wise is just the concept of the absence of fool human beings made up. “Unhappiness comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that unhappy is substance and happy is just the concept of the absence of unhappy human beings made up. “Poor comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that poor is substance and rich is just the concept of the absence of poor human beings made up. “Hell comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that hell is substance and heaven is just the concept of the absence of hell human beings made up. “Devil comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that devil is substance and god is just the concept of the absence of devil human beings made up. “Ruled comes all of a sudden” because it must always subsist in us. In other words, It is a proof that ruled is substance and ruler is just the concept of the absence of ruled human beings made up. We human beings, however, deny the substances that always subsist in us and accept just the concept of absence we made up. It is a reason why human being is a schizophrenic animal that has obtained intelligence. We will never have tomorrow unless we change such way of thinking. A Copernican revolution We human beings have no choice but to live by the right way of thinking. We cannot live now by the way of being in nature (the earth) like other creatures do. We cannot go back to the world of absolute monism. We, however, cannot stay in the world of relative dualism either because it is nothing but the world of relative monism of utilitarianism. This is a trick of relative dualism. The essence of relative dualism is just a road leading up to absolute trialism. The identity of relative dualism is just a road leading down to absolute monism. Relative dualism is nothing but a bridge between monism and trialism. It is nothing but dual factors between the essence and the identity. To put it another way, it shows that the essence and the identity are two sides of the same coin. Relative monism of utilitarianism we have fallen into is a delusion that was fostered as we have directed our eyes to unsubstantial identity and away from substantial essence. Delusions are just paradoxical phenomena. A Copernican revolution is the key to the right way of thinking. Delusions are nothing but paradoxical phenomena of Copernican revolutions. “Alive is good and dead is bad” is a delusion. “Dead is good and alive is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Male is good and female is bad” is a delusion. “Female is good and male is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Right is good and wrong is bad” is a delusion. “Wrong is good and right is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Strong is good and weak is bad” is a delusion. “Weak is good and strong is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Wise is good and fool is bad” is a delusion. “Fool is good and wise is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Rich is good and poor is bad” is a delusion. “Poor is good and rich is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Happy is good and unhappy is bad” is a delusion. “Unhappy is good and happy is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Heaven is good and hell is bad” is a delusion. “Hell is good and heaven is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “God is good and devil is bad” is a delusion. “Devil is good and god is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Healthy is good and ill is bad” is a delusion. “Ill is good and healthy is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. “Ruler is good and ruled is bad” is a delusion. “Ruled is good and ruler is bad” would be a Copernican revolution. |